Disclosure Hub

In this section

Additional Metrics
Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) Index
International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)
Climate-Related Risks and Opportunities
2025 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Verification Statement
2025 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Verification Statement

Additional Metrics

IFRS S2: 29(a)

1 2019 data reflects Alaska and Horizon, except scope 1 and 2 emission and their respective updates to Emissions intensity and fuel efficiency and Aircraft fuel - conventional jet fuel data disclosures. 2019 scope 1 and 2 emissions were recalculated to include Hawaiian Airlines in our baseline year.

2 AAG does not disclose all 15 categories of Scope 3 emissions. Based on the initial Scope 3 emissions screening exercise, it was determined that categories 1-3 and 8 were the most material, and therefore AAG discloses these emissions in the annual impact report.

3 For 2025: third-party Capacity Purchase Agreement (CPA) flying was included in Scope 3 Category 1, previously was in Category 3.

4 Includes emissions from jet fuel consumption on flights operated for Amazon.

5 Alaska Airlines only. As of 2024, Hawaiian Airlines did not purchase sustainable aviation fuel.

6 Scope 1 conventional jet fuel emissions.

7 Scope 1 conventional jet fuel emissions.

8 Revenue ton mile. Calculation for this metric is based on passenger, cargo, and baggage RTM. Therefore, metric will differ compared to 2025 goal. To remain transparent of emissions intensity through the combination with Hawaiian Airlines for this data point, full year 2024 RTM for Hawaiian Airlines was used.

9 For 2025: Mainline (Alaska and Hawaiian Airlines) and wholly-owned subsidiary (Horizon Air) fuel purchased. For 2024: Since Hawaiian Airlines’ full year 2024 emissions inventory was calculated, full year RTM and ASM were used to calculate Hawaiian Airlines’ normalized emissions.

10 Gallons purchased in 2025 for use by Alaska, Hawaiian and Horizon. Gallons purchased in full year 2024 for use by Alaska Airlines/Horizon Air and full year 2024 for use by Hawaiian Airlines.

11 Alaska and Horizon facilities with available water consumption bills.

12 Alaska and Hawaiian Airlines are required to report all spills, regardless of quantity or material, in the State of Hawaiʻi as mandated by the State Department of Transportation – Airports Division (DOTA). This includes spills ranging from as little as 1 gallon to over 100 gallons.

13 Full-time and part-time breakdown percentages disclosed at AAG level in 10-K filings.

14 Prior to the combination, Hawaiian Airlines did not have an employee volunteering and rewards program. HA employees will transition into Alaska and Horizon employee volunteering and rewards program in 2026.

15 Alaska Airlines Foundation grants only.

Download Additional Metrics PDF

Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) Index

Airlines

Greenhouse Gas Emissions

Disclosure Code
Metric
Units of Measure
Response
TR-AL-110a.1
Gross global Scope 1 emissions
Metric tons (MT) CO₂e
10,449,366 MT CO₂e
2025 GHG emissions inventory
TR-AL-110a.2
Discussion of long- and short-term strategy or plan to manage Scope 1 emissions, emissions reduction targets, and an analysis of performance against those targets
N/A
2025 Impact Goals Results
Five-part path to Net Zero Carbon Emissions by 2040
TR-AL-110a.3
(1) Total fuel consumed
(2) Percentage alternative
(3) Percentage sustainable
Gigajoules (GJ), Percentage (%)
(1) 142,966,244 GJ (2) 0% (3) 1.01%

Labor Practices

Disclosure Code
Metric
Units of Measure
Response
TR-AL-310a.1
Percentage of active workforce employed under collective agreements
Percentage (%)
2025 10-K, pg. 14
TR-AL-310a.2
(1) Number of work stoppages
(2) Total days idle
Number, Days idle
(1) 0 (2) 0

Competitive Behavior

Disclosure Code
Metric
Units of Measure
Response
TR-AL-520a.1
Total amount of monetary losses as a result of legal proceedings associated with anti-competitive behaviour regulations
Presentation currency
Zero (0) monetary losses as a result of legal proceedings associated with anti-competitive behavior regulations for Alaska, Hawaiian and Horizon for the reporting year.

Accident & Safety Management

Disclosure Code
Metric
Units of Measure
Response
TR-AL-540a.1
Description of implementation and outcomes of a Safety Management System
N/A
Safety Management System
TR-AL-540a.2
Number of aviation accidents
Number
0
TR-AL-540a.3
Number of governmental enforcement actions of aviation safety regulations
Number
0

Activity Metrics1

Disclosure Code
Metric
Units of Measure
Response
TR-AL-000.A
Available seat kilometers (ASK)
ASK
149,607,883,213
TR-AL-000.B
Passenger load factor
Rate
2025 10-K, pg. 36
TR-AL-000.C
Revenue passenger kilometers (RPK)
RPK
124,096,554,232
TR-AL-000.D
Revenue tonne-kilometers (RTK)
RTK
13,909,568,123
TR-AL-000.E
Number of departures
Number
2025 10-K, pg. 36
TR-AL-000.F
Average age of fleet
Years
2025 10-K, pg. 31

1 Activity metrics reflect Alaska Air Group consolidated operations.

International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)

S2

Governance

References
Notes
Environmental Sustainability and Impact Oversight
Governance Structure
Governance, Nominating and Corporate Responsibility Committee Charter
2030 Impact Goals
IFRS S2 6(a)(v): Information on incentives provided for the management of climate-related risks and opportunities is not publicly disclosed.

Strategy

References
Notes
2025 GHG emissions inventory
Climate-Related Risks and Opportunities
Oversight and Management of Climate-Related Risks
Our Environmental Sustainability Strategy
Five-Part Path to Net Zero Carbon Emissions by 2040
2025 10-K
IFRS 15(a), 16(a-d): Alaska does not publicly disclose the current or anticipated financial effects of climate-related risks and opportunities, including: the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities subject to significant risk of material adjustment within the next annual reporting period; how its financial position is expected to change over the short, medium and long term in light of its climate-related strategy, investment and disposal plans, and planned funding sources; or how its financial performance and cash flows are expected to change over the short, medium and long term as a result of managing climate-related risks and opportunities.
IFRS S2 22(a) (iii): Specifics on Alaska's financial resources and assets are not disclosed.

Risk Management

References
Notes
Climate-Related Risks and Opportunities
IFRS S2 25(a)(vi): Alaska has not changed its process for managing climate-related risks since the prior report. The IFRS S2 disclosures are presented differently this year, with disclosure tags incorporated throughout the report where relevant.

Metrics and Targets

References
Notes
2025 Impact Goals Results
2030 Impact Goals
Our Environmental Sustainability Strategy
2025 GHG Emissions Inventory
Additional Metrics
2025 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Verification Statement
IFRS S2 29(b-g): Alaska does not publicly disclose the amounts or percentages of assets or business activities vulnerable to climate-related transition or physical risks, or aligned with climate-related opportunities; capital expenditure, financing or investment deployed towards climate-related risks and opportunities; internal carbon prices or how carbon pricing is applied in decision-making; or whether and how climate-related considerations are factored into executive remuneration.
IFRS S2 34(a), 36(d): Our GHG emissions reduction goal has not been reviewed by a third party. The target was derived using a sectoral decarbonization approach.

Climate-Related Risks and Opportunities

IFRS S2: 6(a,b), 9(a,b,c,d,e); 10 (a,b,c,d), 13(a,b), 14(a,b), 15(b), 22(a,b), 25(a,b,c)

We recognize that climate change poses both risks and opportunities to our business and the communities we serve. Understanding these dynamics is essential to building long-term resilience and informing our strategic priorities. The tables below summarize our key climate-related risks and opportunities, including the impact, time horizon and risk management and opportunity realization strategy.


In 2024, we conducted a comprehensive qualitative climate scenario analysis aligned with the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) framework, drawing on scenarios developed by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and International Organization for Standardization (ISO) guidance. The analysis examined potential climate-related physical and transition risks and opportunities, and assessed the resilience and adaptive capacity of 15 key assets across our operations — including hub airports, office buildings and hangar and maintenance facilities.


As a business operating in a fuel-intensive sector where decarbonization pathways remain constrained by the pace of technological development, it’s important for us to consider both the near-term pressures of an accelerating energy transition and the long-term physical consequences of a higher-emissions future. This context made it essential to select scenarios representing two ends of the policy and emissions spectrum.

Risk Type
Low Emissions Scenario
High Emissions Scenario
Physical
SSP2-4.5
SSP5-8.5
Transition
IEA WEO 2024 Net Zero Emissions by 2050 (NZE)
IEA WEO 2024 Stated Policies Scenario (STEPS)

NZE models a 1.5°C-aligned future of rapid policy intervention, fuel price volatility and accelerating technology deployment, making it most relevant for transition risk. STEPS reflects a continuation of current policies and the warming trajectory expected without significant improvements, making it the primary lens for physical risk.

Key assumptions underlying this analysis include:

  • Regulatory environment: We are regulated at a federal level by several key government agencies and are therefore sensitive to changes in federal administration and policy direction. We also anticipate near-term compliance obligations under California's climate disclosure regulations and are monitoring evolving requirements in other states where we operate, and internationally.
  • Fuel and technology: As a hard-to-abate sector, our business model is highly dependent on the scaling of SAF and other decarbonization technologies.
  • Physical environment: We operate routes across a wide range of geographies and weather conditions, including destinations where air travel is the primary or sole mode of transportation during certain seasons. Changes to weather patterns, infrastructure reliability and seasonal accessibility could affect operations across our network.
  • Energy use: The majority of our offices are located in the Pacific Northwest, a region that benefits from a high share of hydroelectric power in its energy mix, which influences our Scope 2 emissions profile under both scenarios.

These scenarios are qualitative and based on the assumptions described above. For further detail, please refer to the Risk Factors section of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2025, including risk factors specific to climate change and extreme weather events.

The risk level shown in the table below integrates the current resilliency and adaptive-capacity measures, and the impact time horizons are categorized as follows:

  • Short-term: Present day to 2030
  • Medium-term: 2030–2040
  • Long-term: 2040–2050

Coming out of this assessment, we have continued to build upon our structured process to identify, assess, prioritize and monitor climate-related risks and opportunities across our business. Climate-related risks are integrated into our Enterprise Risk Management (ERM) process, owned by AAG's Internal Audit team. Managed by our internal audit team, our ERM process engages business leaders in identifying, prioritizing and managing risks — including those related to climate and environmental factors — and ensuring visibility of these risks and associated mitigation strategies to the Board of Directors.

We conduct quarterly meetings to identify, monitor and integrate risks, including those related to climate change, into our ERM process. This includes understanding potential impacts, analyzing relevant trends, evaluating mitigation strategies and monitoring metrics. Our ERM also helps us better understand which climate-related risks and opportunities we are potentially exposed to and how to manage these risks. Executive leaders are responsible for identifying, prioritizing and managing identified risks on an ongoing basis.

We will continue to monitor climate-related physical and transition risks and opportunities that may impact our business while actively exploring opportunities for innovation and responsible growth.


Following the scenario analysis, findings were presented to senior leaders across operations, business continuity, risk, safety and finance, who recognized the value of further integrating these insights into existing processes. The Sustainability team is actively engaging with these cross-functional teams as integration work is prioritized, and we are committed to transparency regarding our findings and progress as this work continues. The findings from our scenario analysis, alongside insights from our 2025 double materiality assessment, informed the development of our new 2030 goals.


View our climate scenario analysis

2025 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Verification Statement

2025 Greenhouse Gas Emissions Verification Statement

Previous Section: Governance
Return to: Table of Contents
Previous Section